Aluminium PFC Slope

[/business/processes/production/aluminium/pfc/slope]

Metal industry methodology, aluminium. Calculates carbon tetrafluoride (CF4) and carbon hexafluoride (C2F6) emissions based on the quantity of aluminium produced, and process data on anode effect overvoltage and current efficiency. Scenarios include variants of the prebake processes. Globally applicable.

Summary

This methodology represents carbon tetrafluoride (CF4) and carbon hexafluoride (C2F6) emissions associated with the production of aluminium. The data and calculation methodology is sourced from the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP) worksheet tool GHG emissions from the production of aluminum, version 2.0, which is ultimately based on the methodologies described in Volume 3, Chapter 4 - Metal Industry Emissions of their 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.


The methodology

Emissions model

Aluminium is extracted from its ore (aluminium oxide (Al2O3), or 'bauxite') using an electrolysis cell and carbon anodes. During electrolysis, aluminium oxide is dissolved in a fluoride melt comprising about 80% (by weight) cryolite (Na3AlF6). Perfluorocarbons (CF4 and C2F6 collectively referred to as PFCs) are formed from the reaction of the carbon anode with the cryolite melt in cases where the concentration of aluminium oxide in the electrolyte is too low to support the standard anode reaction - a condition known as an anode effect.

This methodology enables the calculation of aluminium-associated CF4 and C2F6 emissions on the basis of conversion factors (slope coefficient; i.e. kg·day / t·min) which describe the relationship between the anode effect and the rates at which CF4 is emitted in relation to the quantity of aluminium produced. By specifying the quantity of aluminium produced and the anode effect minutes per cell day, a calculation for the associated CF4 emissions can be made. C2F6 emissions are calculated as a fixed proportion of the CF4 emissions. This proportion can be specified on a facility specific basis, but is represented by a default value if this data is unavailable.

This methodology represents the IPCC Tiers 2/3 approaches, the distinction being the use of facility specific data (which corresponds to tier 3).

Model data

The rates at which CF4 and C2F6 are emitted depend on the specific type of technology employed. This methodology provides emissions factors representing the typical unit emissions associated with two scenarios, differentiated by technology type (e.g. Centre Work Prebake, Horizontal Stud Soderberg). Each technology type is represented by default values for the slope coefficient and the CF4/C2F6 weight fraction, although these values can be specified on facility-specific basis if data is available.

In addition, the global warming potentials of CF4 and C2F6 are also used in order to convert absolute emissions quantities into CO2e quantities - i.e. the quantity of CO2 which would exert the same atmospheric warming effect.

Activity data required

CF4 and C2F6 emissions are directly proportionate to two quantities, both of which must be provided in order to calculate: (1) the quantity of aluminium produced (i.e. mass); and (2) the anode effect minutes per cell day.

In addition, the methodology enables the specification of facility-specific values for the slope coefficient and the CF4/C2F6 weight fraction where these are available.

Calculation and results

CF4 and C2F6 emissions are calculated according to the activity data specified, and converted into a total CO2e quantity using the associated global warming potentials. Three quantities are ultimately returned: CF4, C2F6, and total CO2e.

These emissions represent those attributable to the specified quantity of aluminium produced.


Related methodologies

Other IPCC methodologies for aluminium-associated PFC emissions are available. These include an alternative tiers 2/3 approach (the overvoltage method), and the simpler tier 1 methodology.

In addition, IPCC methodologies for aluminium-associated CO2 emissions are available, including the generic (tier 1) approach and more detailed, technology-specific prebake and Søderberg methodologies.

 UIDLabel
PQPBG6F04MP2 Centre Work Prebake
665SB2F588C4 Horizontal Stud Soderberg
NLID6R623YJX Side Work Prebake
3RI3Z5UT5E3D Vertical Stud Soderberg
Log in to perform calculations on this data